MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133300807 · doi:10.1136/bcr-2020-239498

Blastomycosis with rapid-onset acute respiratory distress syndrome in an urban setting

2021· article· en· W3133300807 on OpenAlexaffabout
Arnav Agarwal, Jennifer A. Losie, Dylan Kain, Rupert Kaul

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlastomycosisBronchoalveolar lavageBronchoscopyBlastomycesExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationCytopathologyRespiratory failureMediastinumRespiratory distressBlastomyces dermatitidisRadiologySurgeryPathologyInternal medicineLungCytology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While blastomycosis is endemic to eastern USA and northwestern Ontario, acquisition is an anomaly in urban settings. We present a 54-year-old immunocompetent man from the greater Toronto area with no travel, who presented with a 3-week history of chest pain and dyspnoea. Initial radiographic workup revealed a mass-like opacification in the right apical mediastinum. Extensive investigations including bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, mediastinal mass biopsy with fungal and mycobacterial cultures and multiple stains, and CT were unrevealing. The patient progressed to respiratory failure over 4 months. Ultimately, sputum and bone marrow cultures confirmed a diagnosis of disseminated blastomycosis. The patient required prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ongoing ventilation postdecannulation. Our case highlights diagnostic challenges with blastomycosis, particularly in immunocompetent individuals with no travel to recreational areas, and emphasises the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion and sending fungal cultures of appropriate specimens and/or cytopathology in clinically compatible cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207