MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Modeling Polarization Convertor Unit-cell

2020· article· en· W3133301211 on OpenAlexaff
Fereshteh Samadi, Abdel-Razik Sebak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceDiagonalNonlinear systemArtificial neural networkPolarization (electrochemistry)Range (aeronautics)AlgorithmIterative methodElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, a data-driven learning algorithm is presented to reduce the highly time-consuming and computationally expensive iterative progression of design using full-wave (FW)simulators. It approximates the nonlinear relationship between the electromagnetic design and associated desired performance. A polarization convertor unit-cell with n number of diagonal dipoles as a patch is considered and the effect of geometrical parameters on the required performance and frequency range is investigated using convolutional neural network (CNN). The developed CNN has the capability of fast prediction of geometrical parameters for any user-defined frequency ranges between 10 GHz to 50 GHz of desired characteristics. As a proof-of-concept, FW simulation results are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed CNN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→