Elevational and Latitudinal Changes in Cold Tolerance of Nymph and Adult Mormon Crickets <i>Anabrus simplex</i> (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insects that hatch in winter and early spring in desert and montane regions are likely to encounter extreme weather events, including precipitous drops in temperature. The susceptibility of insects to exposure to subzero temperatures is predicted to decrease with increasing latitude or elevation. Mormon crickets occur over a broad latitudinal range from southwestern United States to Canada and a broad elevational range from near sea-level to 3,000 m. Population declines have been attributed to late freezing events, but winter hatching suggests they may also be cold tolerant. Lower lethal temperature of high elevation populations in low latitude Arizona (AZ) and high latitude Wyoming (WY) was measured by exposing nymphs and adults to 6 h or 24 h of subzero temperature. From similar latitude, WY was compared with mid-elevation Idaho (ID) and low elevation Oregon (OR) populations. Contrary to the prediction, lethal temperature of third instar nymphs was lower in AZ than in the more northerly populations. Consistently, AZ was more tolerant of cold in early nymphal instars relative to populations from higher latitude. Early hatching at lower latitudes might increase the risk of early instars experiencing a severe cold snap relative to nymphs at high latitudes. Also, contrary to prediction, the lethal temperature of adults increased with elevation, whereas third instar nymphs from mid-elevation ID were the most susceptible to cold exposure. Cold tolerance in immature and mature stages is more likely to be uncoupled when life stages do not coincide, as with Mormon crickets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".