Funkcja ekspresywna języka rosyjskiego w wielojęzycznym środowisku młodzieży szkół polskich na Litwie i Ukrainie.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper attempts to present the sociolinguistic situation of the multilingual youth from Lithuania and Ukraine, with a particular focus on the function of the Russian language examined from the angle of emotional language behaviours and the Russian-Polish confrontation related to translation of a cultural text. The material basis is the results of a questionnaire survey carried out by the authors among students of schools with Polish as the language of instruction in Vilnius, Lviv, and Horodok in 2018. The comparative analysis covered the linguistic self-assessment of the representatives of two student environments and models of verbal expression of positive and negative emotional states. The analysis of the cultural and linguistic competence was performed on the example of a translation of Russian marked reduplicative expressions. As a result of the analysis, it can be stated that Russian is perceived and used by the surveyed multilingual youth as the most expressive language code.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it