The effect of work environment and individual characteristics on pilot performance with professionalism as an intervening variable
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of the work environment on professionalism, analyzing the effect of individual characteristics on professionalism, analyzing the effect of professionalism on pilot performance, analyzing the influence of the work environment on pilot performance with professionalism as an intervening variable and analyzing the influence of individual characteristics on pilot performance in Lion Air with professionalism as an intervening variable. The number of samples in this study were 165 respondents. The data analysis technique used path analysis. The results of the analysis show that the work environment has an effect on professionalism. Individual characteristics affect professionalism. The work environment affects pilot performance. Individual characteristics have an effect on pilot performance. The work environment affects the pilot's performance with professionalism as an intervening variable. Individual characteristics affect pilot performance with professionalism as an intervening variable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it