Unfolded and intermediate states of PrP play a key role in the mechanism of action of an antiprion chaperone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prion and prion-like diseases involve the propagation of misfolded protein conformers. Small-molecule pharmacological chaperones can inhibit propagated misfolding, but how they interact with disease-related proteins to prevent misfolding is often unclear. We investigated how pentosan polysulfate (PPS), a polyanion with antiprion activity in vitro and in vivo, interacts with mammalian prion protein (PrP) to alter its folding. Calorimetry showed that PPS binds two sites on natively folded PrP, but one PPS molecule can bind multiple PrP molecules. Force spectroscopy measurements of single PrP molecules showed PPS stabilizes not only the native fold of PrP but also many different partially folded intermediates that are not observed in the absence of PPS. PPS also bound tightly to unfolded segments of PrP, delaying refolding. These observations imply that PPS can act through multiple possible modes, inhibiting misfolding not only by stabilizing the native fold or sequestering natively folded PrP into aggregates, as proposed previously, but also by binding to partially or fully unfolded states that play key roles in mediating misfolding. These results underline the likely importance of unfolded states as critical intermediates on the prion conversion pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".