MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3133451047 · doi:10.21838/uhpc.9728

Key Learnings and Trends in UHPC Bridge Activities since 2016

2019· article· en· W3133451047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gregory Nault

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteBridge (graph theory)EngineeringDeckCivil engineeringReinforced concreteForensic engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presentation is meant to provide an overview of the ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) bridge activities and projects since the First International Interactive Symposium on Ultra-High Performance Concrete which took place in Des Moines, Iowa in 2016.Since then, over135additional bridges have been constructed using UHPC bringing the total number of projects in North America to over 280 bridges. The years prior to 2016 were largely dominated by precast deck panel projects with UHPC connections in the New York State region of the U.S. and by adjacent box beam projects with longitudinal UHPC connections in Northwestern Ontario. Since 2016, the Northeastern region of the U.S. (i.e. New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, etc.) continue to regularly utilize UHPC on their projects. Additionally, there has been growing interest in the Western U.S. (i.e. California, Idaho, Colorado, Oregon)and the Southeast (i.e. Florida, Georgia, South Carolina). The figures below show the number of completed bridge projects with UHPC by year (left) and the locations of these projects(right). The state of Idaho, in particular,has seen substantial activity since standardizing UHPC connections for two of their superstructure types (i.e. deck bulb-tees and solid/voided slab beams). The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) has replaced over ten (10) bridge superstructures with UHPC since 2016, with more in the pipeline for 2019 and beyond. The Iowa DOT has also standardized UHPC connections for their adjacent box beam structures and is letting an 8 to 14 bridge replacement package in 2019. While precast deck panels and adjacent box beams are still popular applications, there has been a notable increase in other superstructure types such asdeck bulb tees, next beams, voided slabs, and prefabricated bridge units (PBUs) with longitudinal UHPC connections. These systems have become popular, particularly for shorter span structures, as a means to rapidly replace existing deteriorated superstructures using the Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) methodology. In conjunction with these ABC systems has been an increasing demand for high early-strength UHPC mix designs for closure pour connections. Accelerated UHPCs (e.g. Ductal®JS1212)can attain design compressive strength (typically 14 ksi) in 24-36 hours compared to non-accelerated UHPCs (e.g. Ductal®JS1000)which require 4 days or more to attain this strength. Accelerated UHPCs tend to have a reduced working time, but work well for these ABC superstructure replacements due to the small quantity of UHPC required and the small placement size needed to complete the connection. There has also been an emergence of newer UHPC applications,including substructure connections, link slabs, joint headers, bridge deck patching, and thin-bonded structural overlays. The overlay application, in particular,has been implemented on four bridge projects in the U.S. since 2016 (a solution that is regularly implemented on bridges in Switzerland) and has generated much interest as a means to rehabilitate existing structures and provide long-term protection tonew bridge decks. Lastly, the past few years have also seen an emergence of several new UHPC standards in North America, including 1) the ASTM C1856materials testing standard, 2) the FHWA Checklist for UHPCConnections,3) a 2019 update to the FHWA TechNote on the Design and Construction of Field-Cast UHPC Connections, 4) the AASHTO LRFD Guide Specification for Accelerated Bridge Construction (which includes commentary on UHPC connections), 5) the ACI Emerging Technology Report on UHPC, and 6) the CSA Standards in Canada to be published in 2019. This presentation will highlight the above bridge-related activities in North America and showcase a handful of completed projects since the 2016 symposium including the 3-mile long Pulaski Skyway re-decking project in New Jersey, the new cable-stayed bridge in Nipigon, Ontario, and the multi-span superstructure replacement in Bath, Maine. The presentation will close with a brief discussion on what’s to come in the years ahead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConcrete and Cement Materials Research→French-language works237,207→