Rethinking Virtual Link Mapping in Network Virtualization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Virtual Network Embedding (VNE) that addresses the embedding problems of heterogeneous virtual networks onto a physical limited-capacity infrastructure efficiently is a major challenge in network virtualization (NV). VNE is computationally intractable when considering various constraints on nodes and links, and is also known as NP-hard even in offline embedding. Although the VNE problems have received attentions over recent decades with a vast number of VNE solutions, the majority of them only focus on VNE node mapping, whilst leaving the link mapping stage for the shortest path method or multicommodity flow (MCF) algorithm. We persuasively argue that node and link mappings equally play pivotal roles to approach an efficient VNE solution. In this paper, we reassess the role of link mapping stage in VNE problem, and then propose a novel intelligent VNE orchestration which effectively implements a distributed parallel model to reduce the operation time remarkably. Extensive evaluation results show that our proposed algorithm is not only faster than state-of-the-art VNE algorithms in speed, but also better in all performance metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".