MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract PO-025: Differentiation of benign from clinically significant prostate cancer tissues using convolution neural networks on raw micro-ultrasound data

2021· article· en· W3133560731 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed El Kaffas, Adi Lightstone, Raúl Blázquez García, Brian Woodlinger, Miriam Naim Ibrahim, Richard E. Fan, Geoffrey A. Sonn

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstate cancerMedicineBiopsyUltrasoundProstateRadiologyCancerConvolutional neural networkProstate biopsyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Micro-ultrasound is a promising new technique offering high-resolution images to identify prostate cancer. However, clinical interpretation of the images remains challenging. The underlying raw radio-frequency ultrasound is a unique source of tissue acoustic properties, potentially ideal to identify tissues-of-interest in images for targeted biopsies. Here, we develop a convolutional neural network (3D CNN) to classify tissue as benign vs clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using the raw RF data. Materials and Methods: A total of 837 male patients (median age 63, IQR 57-68) suspected of prostate cancer and undergoing a prostate biopsy were recruited. All data was obtained through an IRB approved at the local data acquisition site (5 collaborating sites); all patients were consented before 29MHz micro-ultrasound (ExactVu, Exact Imaging, Markham, Canada) data acquisition during targeted biopsy. Patients across all sites were scanned using consistent acquisition presets, and all data was saved in raw IQ format. Up to 12 IQ images were obtained for each patient, representing targeted biopsy locations. Histopathological analysis of each biopsy sample served as the clinical standard of benign vs clinically significant cancer (Gleason score (GS) ≥7). Samples containing clinically insignificant cancer (GS6) were not analyzed. Data was processed to maintain both spatial and frequency information for images. A shallow 3D CNN model was trained on patient images (train-test split based on patients); a similar network was also trained with the addition of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level for each patient as a feature. Training used 5220 patient images (4520 benign vs. 700 GS7+;80% of the data); testing was carried out on a set-aside data set of 1310 patient images (1131 benign vs. 179 GS7+ images; 20% of data). The area area under the receiver operator curve (ROC-AUC) was the main evaluation metric. We also explored whether our models could help classify data on a patient level of benign vs. csPSa patients. Results: Preliminary results suggest that our model yields a ROC-AUC of 82% on an image-level to differentiate between benign and csPSa-confirmed images. Including the PSA into our model during training resulted in ROC-AUCs of up to 85%. On a patient level, up to 81% ROC-AUC was achievable in differentiating patients with benign vs. csPSa. Including the PSA on a patient-level resulted in an 87% ROC-AUC. Conclusion: CNNs can help capture unique tissue acoustic properties in micro-ultrasound images to help identify areas suspicious for prostate cancer that warrant targeted biopsy. This offers the potential to improve cancer diagnosis while reducing the number of biopsy cores required. Citation Format: Ahmed El Kaffas, Adi Lightstone, Raul Garcia, Brian Woodlinger, Miriam Ibrahim, Richard Fan, Geoffrey Sonn. Differentiation of benign from clinically significant prostate cancer tissues using convolution neural networks on raw micro-ultrasound data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Diagnosis, and Imaging; 2021 Jan 13-14. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(5_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-025.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→