The Dynamic Regulatory Role of miR-132 in Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Neural Stem Cell Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Neurogenesis and neural stem cell development in the adult hippocampus remains an understudied and controversial area of research. These processes are known to be regulated by the dynamic interplay of transcription factors, cell-niche signalling, and recently, microRNAs. microRNA-132 (miR-132) is one example of a miRNA that offers critical insight into neurogenesis and neural stem cell development. The aim of this study was to systematically review the current literature regarding the role of miR-132-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) and neural stem cell (NSC) development. Methods: The literature search consisted of research articles found in PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Scopus databases using combinations of the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords “micro-RNA 132”, “miR-132”, “adult hippocampal neurogenesis”, and “neural stem cell development” to filter initial results. The study abstracted data in regards to the modalities of miR-132-mediated post-transcriptional regulation and the histophysiological implications associated with AHN and NSC development. Results: miR-132 has been implicated in mediating AHN as well as NSC differentiation and integration into the adult hippocampal dentate gyrus. Knockdown and overexpression of micro-RNA 132 in studies have demonstrated that miR-132 acts as a regulator of several downstream pathways and biochemical targets, including p250-GAP, methyl CpG-binding protein 2, AMPA glutamate receptors, and the RAS/MAPK axon signaling pathway. The fine-tuned modulation of neuronal plasticity associated with miR-132 suggests a role in higher level cognition, learning, and neurodegeneration within the context of Alzheimer’s disease. Discussion: The findings that miR-132 serves as a regulator of AHN and NSC development have significant clinical implications, specifically towards better understanding the pathological basis of neurodegenerative disorders as well as the development of novel miRNA-based therapeutics. Conclusion: The systematic review aggregated key findings on multiple potential biochemical targets and downstream feedback regulation pathways associated with miR-132 expression. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism of each pathway and the potential interplay between multiple proteins regulated by miR-132 that are associated with clinical disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".