Millimeter-Wave Integrated Side-Fire Leaky-Wave Antenna and its Application as a Spectrum Analyzer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analog, low-profile and shielded spectrum analyzer is proposed for operation at mm-wave frequencies around the 60 GHz band based on a novel side-fire Leaky-Wave Antenna (LWA) configuration. The proposed side-fire periodic LWA is systematically developed from a conventional 3-port waveguide T-junction which is modified to a LWA unit cell with an internal matching mechanism to suppress the stop-band and enable broadside radiation based on unit cell symmetry considerations. The resulting periodic side-fire antenna radiates in the plane of the antenna, whereby the leakage power be either be allowed to radiate in free-space or kept confined inside a PPW structure. The proposed side-fire structure thus can be completely shielded useful as an analog broadband spectrum analyzer using Substrate Integrated Waveguide (SIW) Technology. Furthermore, a convex side-fire antenna is demonstrated to focus the radiated beams in the near-field of the structure to make the entire system compact. The integrated spectrum analyzer is experimentally demonstrated between 59 GHz - 66 GHz providing 1 GHz frequency resolution. Furthermore, a simple mathematical model consisting of array of line sources is proposed to efficiently model the beam-scanning characteristics of the curved side-fire LWA in the near-field of the structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".