MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133633508 · doi:10.15517/aeca.v46i0.45081

Crítica y crisis en Nicaragua: la tensión entre democracia y capitalismo

2020· article· es· W3133633508 on OpenAlex
Hloreley Osorio Mercado, Rony Rodríguez-Ramírez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnuario de Estudios Centroamericanos · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American socio-political dynamics
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceDemocracyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde una perspectiva de la estructura y la agencia, el artículo analiza la crítica y la crisis en Nicaragua durante el gobierno de Ortega (2007-2020). Ello muestra que los “juicios singulares” de sectores sociales para frenar el autoritarismo y el capitalismo neoliberal, interpretados por el gobierno como enemigos del progreso (2007- marzo 2018), transitaron a un “juicio general” de sectores sociales y empresariales que, representados en la Alianza Cívica y observando los crímenes de lesa humanidad, critican el autoritarismo y la injusticia, lo que el gobierno evalúa como un intento de golpe de Estado (abril 2018- 2020). El conflicto entre juicios llevó a un diálogo nacional con decisiones parciales, mientras la crisis sociopolítica y económica se profundiza. El análisis devela la necesidad de promover democracia con justicia social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it