MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133657401 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.166

A168 HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN WOMEN WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: FROM PRECONCEPTION TO POSTPARTUM

2021· article· en· W3133657401 on OpenAlexaffabout
G Wang, Nicole Rodriguez, Lindsy Ambrosio, Parul Tandon, Vivian Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseCalprotectinUlcerative colitisInternal medicinePregnancyQuality of life (healthcare)GastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In pregnancy and postpartum, distinguishing IBD-specific symptoms is challenging. The extent to which pregnancy and disease activity affects HRQoL in IBD patients remains unknown. Aims To assess women with and without IBD at pre-, intra-, and postpartum timepoints, and examine the impact of pregnancy, IBD type, and disease activity on IBD-related HRQoL. Methods Preconception (PC) and pregnant women aged ≥18 years with and without IBD completed surveys at various timepoints from PC to 12 months postpartum (PP). The Short IBD Questionnaire (SIBDQ) is a validated survey that assesses HRQoL in IBD patients and covers bowel, emotional, systemic, and social domains; a higher score indicates a better HRQoL. Participants completed SIBDQ and modified Harvey Bradshaw Index (mHBI) for CD or partial Mayo score (pMayo) for UC. Clinically active disease was defined as mHBI ≥5 or pMayo ≥2; objectively active disease was defined as C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥8.0mg/L or fecal calprotectin (FC) ≥250mg/kg. Continuous variables were analyzed by the t-test whereas categorical variables were assessed by the chi-squared test, with p<0.05 suggestive of statistical significance. Results 61 patients with IBD (36 UC, 25 CD) and 12 healthy controls were included. In IBD patients, SIBDQ was positively associated with income during PC, but not once patients became pregnant. No association was found with education level. There were no significant differences in mean SIBDQ between study timepoints. SIBDQ was significantly lower in IBD patients with clinically active disease at all trimesters of pregnancy and all PP timepoints, but not at PC. SIBDQ was significantly lower in patients with high CRP during trimester 1 (T1), but not later in pregnancy. Generally, SIBDQ was lower in patients with higher FC; SIBDQ bowel scores were significantly lower in patients with high FC at T2, T3, and PP6. During PC, SIBDQ was significantly higher in UC patients than CD patients; this difference was lost in pregnancy. During PP, SIBDQ bowel and social scores were significantly lower in UC patients than CD patients at 6 months. Compared to healthy controls, IBD patients had significantly lower SIBDQ at PC, T1, and T2; they also had significantly lower SIBDQ bowel scores in early PP, which resolved by 12 months. In IBD patients, no association was found between PP SIBDQ scores and breastfeeding or delivery method. Conclusions Women with IBD experience worse HRQoL in early pregnancy, and worse bowel-related HRQoL postpartum. UC patients have better PC HRQoL but suffer worse postpartum bowel-related HRQoL than CD patients. Overall, SIBDQ correlates well with clinical and biochemical disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum. Funding Agencies Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (WCHRI), Centre of Excellence for Gastrointestinal Inflammation and Immunity Research (CEGIIR), University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207