Floral biology and visitors of Montrichardia arborescens (L.) Schott (Araceae) in Caxiuanã National Forest, Amazon Region, Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genus Montrichardia is widely distributed across the Brazilian Amazon, however very little is known about its floral biology and floral visitors. This study, carried out over four days in September 2011 in the Caxiuanã National Forest aimed to investigate aspects of floral biology such as inflorescence growth, reproductive function, fruit size and principal visitors of Montrichardia arborescens in eastern Amazonia. It was estimated that the inflorescences monitored over the four day period were open for between 48-72 hours. Open inflorescences emitted more heat during morning visits compared to evening visits. Floral visitor numbers were dramatically lower than those reported in other studies. Out of the 75 individuals of Montrichardia arborescens observed, only seven received visitors. Results also showed no significant difference in pollen viability across measured spadix sections. Lastly, the number of carpels per fruit showed no significant effect on fruit size and shape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".