La dynamique du stress au travail est-elle transactionnelle?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le modèle transactionnel du stress est l'un des modèles explicatifs les mieux connus. Par un mécanisme de double évaluation, cette perspective cognitivo-phénoménologique propose que l'état de stress émane d'une inadéquation entre les demandes contextuelles et les ressources personnelles. Peu de validations intégrales de ce modèle ont été effectuées jusqu’à maintenant. Cette étude propose une vérification de l’ensemble de la dynamique transactionnelle du stress en contexte professionnel au moyen d’une étude transversale auprès de 420 enseignants. L'étude cherche à vérifier la séquence sous-jacente au modèle transactionnel ainsi que divers effets médiateurs/modérateurs issus de l'intervention de certaines caractéristiques individuelles. Les résultats des analyses statistiques permettent globalement de considérer que la perspective transactionnelle est une façon efficace de conceptualiser le stress au travail en milieu scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".