MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133765523 · doi:10.1090/proc/15545

Conformal measures and the Dobrušin-Lanford-Ruelle equations

2021· article· en· W3133765523 on OpenAlexaff
Luísa Borsato, Sophie MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsConformal mapCountable setEquivalence (formal languages)MathematicsMeasure (data warehouse)Gibbs measureProperty (philosophy)Pure mathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate the equivalence of two definitions of a Gibbs measure on a subshift over a countable group. We formulate a more general version of the classical Dobrušin-Lanford-Ruelle equations with respect to a measurable cocycle, which reduce to the classical equations when the cocycle is induced by an interaction or a potential, and show that a measure satisfying these equations must have the conformal property. We also review methods of constructing an interaction from a potential and vice versa, such that the interaction and the potential have the same Gibbs and equilibrium measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207