MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UpFrontPSMA: A randomized phase II study of sequential 177Lu-PSMA617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC).

2021· article· en· W3133767883 on OpenAlexaff
Arun Azad, Nattakorn Dhiantravan, Louise Emmett, Anthony M. Joshua, Ian Vela, David A. Pattison, Roslyn J. Francis, Scott Williams, Shahneen Sandhu, Ian D. Davis, Nitika Neha, Mathias Bressel, Declan G. Murphy, Michael S. Hofman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocetaxelMedicineProstate cancerCabazitaxelAndrogen deprivation therapyOncologyCancerInternal medicineProstateNuclear medicineUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS180 Background: 177Lu‐PSMA-617 (Lu-PSMA) is a radiolabeled small-molecule that binds with high affinity to PSMA enabling highly targeted delivery of beta radiation to prostate cancer cells. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, Lu-PSMA showed superior activity to Cabazitaxel in the TheraP trial. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + Docetaxel is a standard of care for de novo high-volume mHNPC, outcomes remain sub-optimal for many patients. We hypothesize that Lu-PSMA prior to docetaxel will achieve a higher undetectable PSA rate at 12 months compared to docetaxel alone in men with newly-diagnosed high-volume mHNPC. Methods: UpFrontPSMA is an open label, randomized, stratified, 2-arm, multi-center, phase 2 clinical trial recruiting 140 patients at 11 Australian centers. Key eligibility criteria include histological diagnosis of prostate cancer within 12 weeks, PSA > 10ng/ml at diagnosis, < 4 weeks on ADT, and high-volume (≥ 4 bone metastases with ≥ 1 outside the axial skeleton, and/or visceral metastases), PSMA-avid disease on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with no major discordance on 18FDG-PET/CT. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the experimental arm (Lu-PSMA 7.5 GBq q6w x 2 cycles followed 6 weeks later by docetaxel 75mg/m2 q3w x 6 cycles), or standard-of-care Arm (docetaxel alone). All patients will receive continuous ADT. Assessments will be done every 3 weeks during study treatment, and then every 6-12 weeks until unequivocal disease progression. CT and whole body bone scan will be performed at baseline and every 12 weeks, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at baseline and 12 weeks, and 18FDG-PET/CT at baseline and 12 weeks (if applicable). Correlative samples will include optional tumour tissue (baseline and disease progression), and serial plasma/whole blood collection. The primary endpoint is undetectable PSA (≤ 0.2 ng/ml) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are safety, time to castration resistance, PSA-progression-free-survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic PFS, radiographic response rates, early PSMA-PET response rates, quality of life and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints are prognostic and predictive value of PET-derived parameters and of biomarkers identified in plasma/whole blood/tumour tissue. The study will have 85% power to reject the null hypothesis if the true 12 month undetectable PSA rate in the experimental Arm is 50%. The power calculation assumes no more than 10 patients (7%) of the 140 patients will be unevaluable or lost to follow-up in 1 year, 5% alpha and two-sided test for proportions. As of October 13, 2020, accrual stands at 4. UpFrontPSMA is an investigator-led, academic trial sponsored by Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in collaboration with ANZUP Cancer Trials Group with study coordination provided by the Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials (BaCT) Clinical trial information: NCT04343885.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.550
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207