MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133780609 · doi:10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.02.003

A technical guide to supraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression

2021· article· en· W3133780609 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad A. Hussain, Musaad AlHamzah, Mohammed Al‐Omran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThoracic outlet syndromeBrachial plexusThoracic outletDecompressionCervical ribRib cageSurgeryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated condition that occurs owing to neurogenic, arterial, and/or venous compression in the thoracic outlet.1Hussain M.A. Aljabri B. Al-Omran M. Vascular thoracic outlet syndrome.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 28: 151-157Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar There are two main surgical approaches to TOS decompression: transaxillary and supraclavicular. The supraclavicular approach has several potential advantages, including that it allows for complete anterior and middle scalenectomy, resection of cervical and first ribs, brachial plexus neurolysis, and vascular reconstruction.1Hussain M.A. Aljabri B. Al-Omran M. Vascular thoracic outlet syndrome.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 28: 151-157Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar, 2Sanders R.J. Annest S.J. Technique of supraclavicular decompression for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61: 821-825Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar, 3Caputo F.J. Wittenberg A.M. Vemuri C. Driskill M.R. Earley J.A. Rastogi R. et al.Supraclavicular decompression for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in adolescent and adult populations.J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57: 149-157Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar, 4Sanders R.J. Hammond S.L. Management of cervical ribs and anomalous first ribs causing neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36: 51-56Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar The objective of this video guide was to demonstrate a comprehensive approach to supraclavicular TOS decompression. A young woman presented with right-sided arterial and neurogenic TOS at a high-volume tertiary care TOS center. Signs and symptoms of arterial compression included arm fatigue with use, pallor, and absent radial pulse with provocative maneuvers. Neurogenic symptoms included hand and arm pain, paresthesia, and weakness. Duplex ultrasound examination showed a normal flow in the subclavian artery at rest, but occlusion with provocative maneuvers. A computed tomography scan confirmed presence of a right-sided cervical rib. A right-sided supraclavicular incision was made starting from the clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and extending laterally to the medial border of the trapezius muscle (Video 1). The operation was subsequently divided into six main steps. (1) Creation of subplatysmal flaps (00:34); (2) mobilization of the scalene fat pad (01:07); (3) anterior scalenectomy (01:44); (4) brachial plexus neurolysis (03:05); (5) middle scalenectomy (03:37); and (6) resection of the cervical (04:27) and first ribs (04:54). In addition, details about patient positioning, electrocautery set-up, surgical instruments, postoperative care, and potential complications are provided in the video. Key steps of the procedure are also illustrated in Fig 1, including (A) isolation of the anterior scalene muscle; (B) result after anterior scalenectomy; (C) isolation of the middle scalene muscle for middle scalenectomy; and (D) resected first rib. Fig 2 shows the result with demonstration of the long thoracic nerve, brachial plexus, subclavian artery, and phrenic nerve.Fig 2Final result with demonstration of the long thoracic nerve (LTN), brachial plexus (BP), subclavian artery (SCA), and phrenic nerve (PN).View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) We believe this video will inform vascular surgeons about the complexities of supraclavicular TOS decompression, help them to optimize their surgical approach, and/or encourage them to refer TOS patients to appropriate centers of excellence. The patient agreed to the recording and publication of this video. https://www.jvscit.org/cms/asset/1e79b623-ad53-4eb5-b6fe-f1cd3b1e3e14/mmc1.mp4Loading ... Download .mp4 (111.76 MB) Help with .mp4 files Video 1Supraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression technical guide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative TechniquesSame topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207