MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133792096 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.193

A195 A RARE CAUSE OF SEVERE REFRACTORY DIARRHEA IN A PATIENT WITH COMMON VARIABLE IMMUNE DEFICIENCY ASSOCIATED INTESTINAL ENTEROPATHY

2021· article· en· W3133792096 on OpenAlexaff
Bharat Markandey, Michael Beyak, Samuel David Jerez Pérez, Paul W. Manley, Mark J. Ropeleski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineCommon variable immunodeficiencyEnteropathyGastroenterologyInternal medicineDiarrheaMicroscopic colitisProtein losing enteropathyIntestinal mucosaImmunologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background CVID is the most common type of severe antibody deficiency. Gastrointestinal manifestations affect approximately 20–50% of patients. Boland et al. described in a case series that 2/3 CVID patients were able to achieve clinical and endoscopic remission with Vedolizumab. This α4β7 integrin antagonist inhibits intestinal T cell translocation by blocking integrin interactions with mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1, reducing lymphocyte mediated inflammation. However, despite its novel use for this indication, limited data is available on the consequences of this therapy in patients with CVID. Aims To report on a case assessing the efficacy and outcomes of Vedolizumab for the treatment of CVID associated autoimmune enteropathy. Methods We present the case of a 50-year-old male presenting with severe refractory diarrhea and malnutrition. A colonoscopy demonstrated patchy ulceration and biopsies revealed ulcerated active colitis, negative for CMV. He was treated with Vedolizumab and Total Parental Nutrition (TPN). His diarrhea resolved, he gained 20 kg and he was weaned off TPN. In 2019, he re-presented with severe diarrhea. Subsequently endoscopic evaluation revealed patchy edematous colonic mucosa and biopsies demonstrated minimally active colitis, negative for CMV. He again responded to Vedolizumab re-induction, however shortly after, his diarrhea returned aggressively. CT enterography demonstrated active jejunal inflammation. Subsequently, an EGD revealed multiple duodenal ulcers and luminal narrowing. Biopsies of the small bowel were sent to histopathology. Results CMV superinfection was diagnosed on pathology (image 1). This patient’s diarrhea completely resolved with IV Gancyclovir and he was discharged on maintenance treatment with oral Valganciclovir. Conclusions This represents the first reported case of CMV enteritis secondary to Vedolizumab for the treatment of CVID associated autoimmune enteropathy. In this case, clinical and endoscopic remission was observed with Vedolizumab, however subsequently hampered by CMV reactivation. Hommel et al., published a positive correlation in a single centre retrospective cohort study of CMV reactivation in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with Vedolizumab. A large retrospective review of data from a multicenter consortium database of over 1000 Vedolizumab treated IBD patients reported CMV colitis in only 4 patients. CMV reactivation appears to be an exceptionally rare but important event in patients treated with Vedolizumab. Based on this report, patients with CVID associated enteropathy and refractory diarrhea should be carefully screened for CMV when treated with Vedolizumab. Further prospective data assessing the incidence of CMV reactivation in patients with Vedolizumab therapy is required to further define these findings. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207