Tensor-Based Approach for Liquefied Natural Gas Leakage Detection From Surveillance Thermal Cameras: A Feasibility Study in Rural Areas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detection of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) leakage attracts increasing attention for preventing environments and governments from severe pollution and economic loss. Existing frameworks take advantage of stationary surveillance thermal cameras to detect the LNG leakage, which comprises background subtraction and leakage classification. However, these methods are limited in rural areas due to the lack of sensitivity and accuracy. In this article, a generalized framework, i.e., tensor-based leakage detection (TBLD), is proposed to detect LNG leakage in the rural area from surveillance thermal cameras. First, the proposed TBLD takes advantage of tensor factorization to fuse thermal image and corresponding gradient maps for improving sensitivity. Additionally, a finite-state-machine is designed to maintain leakage foreground along with the video streaming. The experiments demonstrate the robust performance of TBLD in the background subtraction stage. Second, multiple classification techniques are explored in the leakage classification stage. The results suggest that the TBLD can accurately detect the LNG leakage by applying 50 layers of residual networks (ResNet50). Finally, compared with contemporary frameworks, the TBLD has consistently improved performance concerning the different distances of LNG leakage. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed TBLD, which also shows the great potential of TBLD in future industrial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".