MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RESEARCH OF THERMOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF UHMWPE AND ITS COMPOSITE WITH QGP AFTER EXPLOSIVE COMPRESSION

2021· article· en· W3133810835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIZVESTIA VOLGOGRAD STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPolymer Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsMaterials scienceExplosive materialComposite materialComposite numberPressingGraphiteHot pressingPolyethylenePolymerFiller (materials)Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To develop the technology of explosive pressing of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and its powder composite mixtures with inorganic fillers, the thermomechanical properties of an unfilled polymer and a composite containing 3% coke graphite powder (KGP) after explosive pressing were studied. It was found that explosive pressing with a pressure of 0.25-1.3 gpa provides high heat resistance of UHMWPE and the studied composite (154-156 °C), and the filler restrains the thermal deformation expansion of the polymer, which is associated with increased intermolecular and adhesive interaction at the phase boundary. Thus, the method of explosive pressing can be recommended for industrial processing of UHMWPE and its composite mixture with 3 % KGP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it