Violence Against Women, Indigenous Self-Determination and Autonomy in Sami Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay considers violence against women and self-determination in contemporary Sami society. It argues that in order for Sami self-determination become meaningful and viable, it must address women’s concerns and needs, including security and freedom from violence. First, the essay examines recent incidents of sexual violence and responses to them in the Sami media. These incidents have eroded the traditional notion of Sami society as peaceful and free of violence. The essay considers also conceptions of “tradition”, including traditional Sami notions of women that are often based on Christianity and in particular, Laestadianism. The essay then proceeds to discuss Sami women’s views on self-determination and how they often are linked to the notion of individual autonomy and integrity. This discussion draws on interviews with fifteen Sami women conducted in Summer 2008. Like many other indigenous women, Sami women regard self-determination as a relational concept in which individual and collective dimensions are intertwined and inter- dependent. Moreover, according to these women, collective self-determination is most effectively practiced in the local level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".