MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133855275 · doi:10.3390/sym13030422

Some Higher-Degree Lacunary Fractional Splines in the Approximation of Fractional Differential Equations

2021· article· en· W3133855275 on OpenAlexaff
H. M. Srivastava, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Juan L. G. Guirao, Y. S. Hamed

Bibliographic record

VenueSymmetry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLacunary functionMathematicsUniquenessApplied mathematicsDifferential equationSpline (mechanical)Degree (music)Fractional calculusMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we begin by introducing two classes of lacunary fractional spline functions by using the Liouville–Caputo fractional Taylor expansion. We then introduce a new higher-order lacunary fractional spline method. We not only derive the existence and uniqueness of the method, but we also provide the error bounds for approximating the unique positive solution. As applications of our fundamental findings, we offer some Liouville–Caputo fractional differential equations (FDEs) to illustrate the practicability and effectiveness of the proposed method. Several recent developments on the the theory and applications of FDEs in (for example) real-life situations are also indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymmetrySame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207