MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133863851 · doi:10.1364/ol.420737

Compressed ultrafast tomographic imaging by passive spatiotemporal projections

2021· article· en· W3133863851 on OpenAlexafffund
Yingming Lai, Ruibo Shang, C. Y. Côté, Xianglei Liu, Antoine Laramée, François Légaré, Geoffrey P. Luke, Jinyang Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsAxis Photonique (Canada)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsStreakStreak cameraOpticsUltrashort pulseCompressed sensingTomographic reconstructionTemporal resolutionIterative reconstructionComputer visionImage resolutionProjection (relational algebra)PhysicsData acquisitionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTomographyLaserAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing streak-camera-based two-dimensional (2D) ultrafast imaging techniques are limited by long acquisition time, the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolutions, and a reduced field of view. They also require additional components, customization, or active illumination. Here we develop compressed ultrafast tomographic imaging (CUTI), which passively records 2D transient events with a standard streak camera. By grafting the concept of computed tomography to the spatiotemporal domain, the operations of temporal shearing and spatiotemporal integration in a streak camera’s data acquisition can be equivalently expressed as the spatiotemporal projection of an ( x , y , t ) datacube from a certain angle. Aided by a new, to the best of our knowledge, compressed-sensing reconstruction algorithm, the 2D transient event can be accurately recovered in a few measurements. CUTI is exhibited as a new imaging mode universally adaptable to most streak cameras. Implemented in an image-converter streak camera, CUTI captures the sequential arrival of two spatially modulated ultrashort ultraviolet laser pulses at 0.5 trillion frames per second. Applied to a rotating-mirror streak camera, CUTI records an amination of fast-bouncing balls at 5,000 frames per second.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207