MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133876669 · doi:10.7759/cureus.13803

Silent Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: PLASMIC, Lessons Learned, and Current Management Overview

2021· article· en· W3133876669 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Pisklakova, Joshua Barbir, Jan-Paul Sambataro, Christian Almanzar, Faiza Manji

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsBrandon Regional Health Authority
FundersHCA Healthcare
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraThrombotic microangiopathyMicroangiopathic hemolytic anemiaADAMTS13AsymptomaticMicroangiopathyPediatricsInternal medicinePlateletDermatologyGastroenterologyDiabetes mellitusDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare, life-threatening autoimmune or hereditary thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) that may be difficult to recognize given the wide spectrum of presenting symptoms. The clinical diagnosis of TTP is based on thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and is confirmed by a disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type one motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13) <10%. However, the latter confirmation is not rapidly available, and treatment is typically initiated based on the degree of clinical suspicion. The PLASMIC score was recently developed to distinguish between TMA patients with and without severe ADAMTS13 deficiency and used as an adjunct in the diagnosis of TTP when the clinical picture is not clear. Here we present the case of a completely asymptomatic female with no past medical history diagnosed with TTP after evaluation for thrombocytopenia found on a routine wellness visit. A high PLASMIC score was crucial in the decision to initiate treatment given an unusual asymptomatic presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207