Les ficelles de l’enquête globale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Issu d’une table-ronde réunissant des chercheurs d’horizons disciplinaires et de générations différentes, cette discussion revient sur les lectures, les usages et les débats que suscite la sociologie d’Yves Dezalay. Cet échange est l’occasion de partager des réflexions plus personnelles sur les pratiques de l’enquête globale mais aussi sur les positions occupées et les rapports au métier de chercheur construits au fil du temps. Les débats permettent de revenir sur tous ces concepts de « moyenne portée », si nombreux au fil de son travail (« compradors », « courtiers de l’international », « agents doubles », « import-export d’État », « luttes de palais », etc.), de discuter du système d’hypothèses formulées par Yves Dezalay, et de resituer celles-ci dans un ensemble d’écarts et de proximités avec d’autres courants (Relations internationales, histoire connectée ou sociologie critique).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".