A review of physical, chemical, and hydrogeologic characteristics of stray gas migration: Implications for investigation and remediation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Releases of natural gas into groundwater from oil and gas exploration, production, or storage (i.e., "stray gas") can pose a risk to groundwater users and landowners in the form of a fire or explosive hazard. The acute nature of stray gas risk differs from the long-term health risks posed by the ingestion or inhalation of other petroleum hydrocarbons (e.g., benzene). Stray gas also exhibits different fate and transport behaviors in the environment from other hydrocarbon contaminants, including the potential for rapid and extensive transport of free-phase gas through preferential pathways, and the resulting variable and discontinuous spatial distribution of free and dissolved gas phases. While there is extensive guidance on response actions for releases of other hydrocarbons such as benzene, there are relatively few examples available in the technical literature that discuss appropriate response measures for the investigation and remediation of stray gas impacts. This paper describes key considerations in the physical, chemical, and hydrogeological characteristics of stray gas releases and implications for the improved investigation and mitigation of associated risks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".