MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133992448 · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2021.01.009

MalDA, Accelerating Malaria Drug Discovery

2021· review· en· W3133992448 on OpenAlexaff
Tuo Yang, Sabine Ottilie, Eva S. Istvan, Karla P. Godinez‐Macias, Amanda K. Lukens, Beatriz Baragaña, Brice Campo, Chris Walpole, Jacquin C. Niles, Kelly Chibale, Koen J. Dechering, Manuel Llinás, Lee M, Nobutaka Kato, Susan Wyllie, Case W. McNamara, Francisco‐Javier Gamo, Jeremy N. Burrows, David A. Fidock, Daniel E. Goldberg, Ian H. Gilbert, Dyann F. Wirth, Elizabeth A. Winzeler

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Parasitology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsStructural Genomics ConsortiumMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthMedicines for Malaria VentureWellcome TrustBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsDruggabilityDrug discoveryMalariaIdentification (biology)Process (computing)DrugComputer scienceMedicineRisk analysis (engineering)PharmacologyBioinformaticsBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Malaria Drug Accelerator (MalDA) is a consortium of 15 leading scientific laboratories. The aim of MalDA is to improve and accelerate the early antimalarial drug discovery process by identifying new, essential, druggable targets. In addition, it seeks to produce early lead inhibitors that may be advanced into drug candidates suitable for preclinical development and subsequent clinical testing in humans. By sharing resources, including expertise, knowledge, materials, and reagents, the consortium strives to eliminate the structural barriers often encountered in the drug discovery process. Here we discuss the mission of the consortium and its scientific achievements, including the identification of new chemically and biologically validated targets, as well as future scientific directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends in ParasitologySame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207