MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134008518 · doi:10.1111/pbr.12908

Quantitative trait loci and candidate genes responsible for pale green flesh colour in watermelon (<i>Citrullus lanatus</i>)

2021· article· en· W3134008518 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shuang Pei, Zheng Liu, Xuezheng Wang, Feishi Luan, Zuyun Dai, Zhongzhou Yang, Qian Zhang, Shi Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Breeding · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvances in Cucurbitaceae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang ProvinceChina Agricultural Research SystemNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFleshBiologyQuantitative trait locusCitrullus lanatusCandidate geneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsGeneGenotypeBotanyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Flesh colour is an important trait that affects the nutritional value, consumer preference, and breeder selection of fruits. In this study, we developed an F2 population derived from crossing the parental lines ZXG1555 (pale green flesh) and Cream of Saskatchewan (short for ‘COS’; pale yellow flesh) to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and predict candidate genes that determine flesh colour and chlorophyll content. We found a major effective QTL (qfc10.1) region harbouring 22 annotated genes related to pale green flesh colour and chlorophyll content in the same region (~519 kb) on chromosome 10. Two Kompetitive Allele‐Specific PCR (KASP) markers were developed based on two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate gene Cla97C10G185970 annotated as plastid lipid‐associated protein, which exhibited a high correlation of pale green and non‐pale green flesh fruits according to the genotype results. The findings of this study provide a fundamental basis for further fine mapping and functional analyses of candidate genes associated with pale green flesh colour in watermelon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant BreedingSame topicAdvances in Cucurbitaceae ResearchFrench-language works237,207