MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134049477 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.151

A153 RECURRENT HENOCH-SCHONLEIN PURPURA FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH ADALIMUMAB

2021· article· en· W3134049477 on OpenAlexaff
Lorraine Stallard, Peter Church

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdalimumabHenoch-Schonlein purpuraPurpura (gastropod)Palpable purpuraAbdominal painInternal medicineDermatologyVasculitisGastroenterologyColonoscopySurgeryCrohn's diseaseErythemaInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Anti Tumour Necrosis Factor-α agents have revolutionised the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Cutaneous adverse events complicate therapy in up to 20% of cases. Most reactions are mild and do not warrant a change of therapy. Henoch–Schönlein purpura (HSP) has rarely been associated with anti-TNFα therapy. It is an acute vasculitis of small vessels that presents with cutaneous purpura of the lower limb, arthritis, nephritis and gastrointestinal involvement. Aims To describe the clinical course of a 16-year-old male presenting with recurrent HSP secondary to adalimumab for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease Methods A retrospective chart review of the patient’s electronic medical record. A literature review of the relevant medical literature. Results History 16 year old boy with Crohn’s disease, initial induction with exclusive enteral nutrition and maintained on adalimumab monotherapy since May 2017. Adalimumab initially 40 mg every 2 weeks, increased to every 10 days in September 2019 due to loose stool and mild inflammation throughout the colon on reassessment colonoscopy. Four separate incidences of purpuric rashes occurring 2–3 days after receiving adalimumab between November 2019 and July 2020. Purpura and petechiae of the lower limb with associated swelling of the feet and heel pain consistent with HSP. Purpura resolved within 1 to 3 weeks, treated with oral steroids on 1 occasion. First episode occurred following increase in dose frequency to every 10 days. Adalimumab frequency was further increased to every 7 days in March 2020. Following this he had 3 further HSP episodes. There was no history of preceding illness or other clear inciting event for HSP. Physical Exam Scattered petechiae on the lower limb bilaterally with large palpable purpura to his feet. Mild swelling to the right foot with tenderness to heel on palpation. Nil other joint swelling. No petechiae elsewhere. Investigations Urinalysis showed trace blood, no proteinuria. Mildly elevated CRP and ESR. Fecal calprotectin elevated >1800. Clinical Progress Rheumatology and Dermatology were consulted. Due to recurrent HSP and active luminal Crohn’s disease on repeat colonoscopy, adalimumab was discontinued and he started Ustekinumab September 2020. There has been no recurrence of relapsing rash and joint pains. Conclusions Four previous cases of HSP associated with Adalimumab have been described, three with Crohn’s disease and 1 with Ulcerative Colitis. Cutaneous manifestations occurred within 18 months of treatment in all previously reported cases. Our patient was treated with Adalimumab for 30 months prior to his first episode of HSP. This association with HSP is not unique to adalimumab, extending to other members of the anti TNFα class including infliximab and etanercept. Hypothesized mechanisms include antibody production, eosinophil activation, shifts in T cell responses and direct drug toxicity to vessel walls. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207