Characterization of Fire Severity in the Moroccan Rif Using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Satellite Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forest ecosystems are exposed increasingly to a variety of human activities and accentuated by climate change. With its Mediterranean climate, Northern Morocco is very hot, which exposes forests to widespread fires. This work aims at the delineation of wildfires and the spectral characterization of burnt vegetation as well as the characterization of the fire severity in the North of Morocco by using Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 spectral data, and topographic data. The methods used include the derivation of wildfires spectral indices and the computation of topographic parameters (elevation, slope, exposure) from SRTM and PALSAR digital elevation models. Then, the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) classification was used to map forest fires' severity. Furthermore, we have compared the severity classes obtained from the SAM method applied to Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 data, with different spectral indices specialized in detecting wildfires, on the one hand, and topographic data, on the other hand. Results showed that MIRBI and NBR indices allow a better characterization of burned areas than BAI index. For its part, SAM classification provides a fair characterization of the severity classes of burnt forests. It has also been shown that the MIRBI index and sun exposure are strongly correlated with severity classes. The obtained maps show the spatial heterogeneity of burns severity and how they interact with topography. These maps may help land resource managers and fire officials predict areas of potential fire hazards and study vegetation regrowth areas after fires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".