First palaeointensity data from the cryogenian and their potential implications for inner core nucleation age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The timing of inner core nucleation is a hugely significant event in Earth's evolution and has been the subject of intense debate. Some of the most recent theoretical estimates for the age of nucleation fall throughout the Neoproterozoic era; much younger than previously thought. A young inner core requires faster recent core cooling rates and a likely hotter early core; knowledge of its age would be invaluable in understanding Earth's thermal history and total energy budget. Predictions generated by numerical dynamo models need to be tested against such data, but records are currently much too sparse to constrain the event to a precise period of time. Here, we present results from 720 Ma dolerite dykes (and one sill) from the Franklin Large Igneous Province, which fall within a crucial 300 Myr gap in palaeointensity records. This study uses three independent techniques on whole rocks from 11 sites spread across High Arctic Canada and Greenland to produce virtual dipole moments ranging from 5 to 20 ZAm2 (mean 11 ZAm2); almost one order of magnitude lower than the present-day field. These weak-field results agree with recent ultralow palaeointensity data obtained from Ediacaran rocks formed ∼150 Myr later and may support that the dynamo was on the brink of collapse in the Neoproterozoic prior to a young inner core formation date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".