Baryonic feedback biases on fundamental physics from lensed CMB power spectra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Upcoming measurements of the small-scale primary cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization power spectra ($TT/TE/EE$) are anticipated to yield transformative constraints on new physics, including the effective number of relativistic species in the early universe (${N}_{\mathrm{eff}}$). However, at multipoles $\ensuremath{\ell}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}3000$, the CMB power spectra receive significant contributions from gravitational lensing. While these modes still carry primordial information, their theoretical modeling requires knowledge of the CMB lensing convergence power spectrum, ${C}_{L}^{\ensuremath{\kappa}\ensuremath{\kappa}}$, including on small scales where it is affected by nonlinear gravitational evolution and baryonic feedback processes. Thus, the high-$\ensuremath{\ell}$ (lensed) CMB is sensitive to these late-time, nonlinear effects. Here, we show that inaccuracies in the modeling of ${C}_{L}^{\ensuremath{\kappa}\ensuremath{\kappa}}$ can yield surprisingly large biases on cosmological parameters inferred from the lensed CMB power spectra measured by the upcoming Simons Observatory and CMB-S4 experiments. For CMB-S4, the biases can be as large as $1.6\ensuremath{\sigma}$ on the Hubble constant ${H}_{0}$ in a fit to $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ and $1.2\ensuremath{\sigma}$ on ${N}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ in a fit to $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}+{N}_{\mathrm{eff}}$. We show that these biases can be mitigated by explicitly discarding all $TT$ data at $\ensuremath{\ell}>3000$ or by marginalizing over parameters describing baryonic feedback processes, both at the cost of slightly larger error bars. We also discuss an alternative, data-driven mitigation strategy based on delensing the CMB $T$ and $E$-mode maps. Finally, we show that analyses of upcoming data will require Einstein-Boltzmann codes to be run with much higher numerical precision settings than is currently standard, so as to avoid similar--- or larger---parameter biases due to inaccurate theoretical predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".