Influence of different dietary oil consumption on nutrient malabsorption: An animal trial using <i>Sprague Dawley</i> rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, the influences of five typical dietary oils (i.e., palm oil, PO; leaf lard oil, LO; rapeseed oil, RO; sunflower oil, SO; and linseed oil, LN) consumption on the nutrients malabsorption were studied using adult male Sprague Dawley rats. Results suggested that the C16:0 (24.534 ± 2.26% to 54.269 ± 1.28%) and C18:0 (18.433 ± 4.421% to 36.455 ± 3.316%) were the dominant fatty acids in fecal samples in different groups. After 6-week intervention by different dietary oils, the fecal moisture and water soluble protein content in PO group, the reducing sugar content in PO, LO, and RO groups were significantly increased compared with those in the control group (p < .05). Moreover, the Na, K, and Fe contents in LO group were all the highest among the all groups. These effects were probably due to the different fatty acids composition as illustrated in the correlation analysis results. The different effects were probably due to their distinct fatty acids composition as illustrated in the correlation analysis results. Results further indicated that the different dietary oils treatment, especially for the PO (SFAs, 43.17 ± 0.98%) and LO (SFAs, 36.44 ± 0.65%), increased the upstream inflammatory cytokine expression level in the Toll-like receptor signal pathway (i.e., TLR4 and MyD88), enhancing the gut permeability. This resulted in significant increase of serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels (p < .05), which was closely connected with different metabolic diseases. The present study may provide basic understandings about different dietary oil enteral nutrition and their effects on gut health. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The PO, LO, RO, SO, and LN are the five of the most typical dietary lipids in Asia countries, especially in China. They are the natural edible oils which are rich in C16:0, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2ω6, and C18:3ω3, respectively. The present study indicated that the different dietary lipid consumption may result in different dietary nutrients malabsorption, which are related with the dietary lipid fatty acid composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".