MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134272703 · doi:10.1101/2021.03.04.433888

TRAIT2D: a Software for Quantitative Analysis of Single Particle Diffusion Data

2021· preprint· en· W3134272703 on OpenAlexafffund
Francesco Reina, John M.A. Wigg, Mariia Dmitrieva, Joёl Lefebvre, Jens Rittscher, Christian Eggeling

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftInternational Seafood Sustainability FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsPython (programming language)Computer scienceSoftwareGraphical user interfaceTracking (education)Computer graphics (images)Software engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Single Particle Tracking (SPT) is one of the most widespread techniques to evaluate particle mobility in a variety of situations, such as in cellular and model membrane dynamics. The proposed TRAIT2D Python library is developed to provide object tracking, trajectory analysis and produce simulated datasets with graphical user interface. The tool allows advanced users to customise the analysis to their requirements. Availability and implementation: the software has been coded in Python, and can be accessed from: https://github.com/Eggeling-Lab-Microscope-Software/TRAIT2D , or the pypi and condaforge repositories. A comprehensive user guide is provided at https://eggeling-lab-microscope-software.github.io/TRAIT2D/ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207