Caída y factores demográficos y clínicos en adultos mayores: estudio de seguimiento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Analizar los factores demográficos y clínicos relacionados a las caídas en el adulto mayor que viven en el domicilio en un seguimiento de cinco años Método: Estudio cuantitativo y longitudinal retrospectivo realizado entre 2007/2008 y 2013 con 262 participantes brasileños con edad superior a 65 años. Se utilizaron los instrumentos de perfil demográfico, Mini Examen del Estado Mental, enfermedades autorreferidas, caídas y sus características, Escala de Fragilidad de Edmonton, Escala de Lawton y Brody y Medida de Independencia Funcional. Se realizaron análisis descriptivo, Chi cuadrado, prueba de Wilcoxon y prueba de modelos mixtos. Estudio aprobado por el comité de ética.Resultados: La mayoría era del sexo femenino, con edad entre 65 a 79 años, escolaridad entre 1 a 4 años y jubilados. La prevalencia de caídas fue de 21,8% y 37,8% en ambas evaluaciones. Se verificó que para cada enfermedad más que el adulto mayor tiene, aumenta la chance de sufrir una nueva caída. Además, para cada punto más en la escala de fragilidad, el adulto mayor tiene mayor chance de caer. Por otro lado, para cada medicamento a menos que el adulto mayor utiliza, presenta 10% menos chance de caer.Conclusión: La caída estuvo asociado a factores clínicos en el adulto mayor siendo necesario que el profesional de salud realice evaluaciones constantes para identificar este evento y sus desencadenantes. Objective: To analyze the demographic and clinical factors related to falls of older adults living at home in a five-year follow-up Materials and methods: Retrospective quantitative and longitudinal study conducted between 2007/2008 and 2013 with 262 Brazilians participants over 65 years old. We used the demographic profile, Mini-Mental State Examination, self-reported diseases, falls and their characteristics, Edmonton Frail Scale, Lawton and Brody Scale, Functional Independence Measure instruments. We performed descriptive analysis, Chi-squared, Wilcoxon test and mixed model test.Results: Most participants were women, aged between 65 to 79 years, schooling between 1 to 4 years and retired. The prevalence of falls was 21.8% and 37.8% in both evaluations. We verified that the chance of suffering a new fall increases for each additional disease of the older adult. In addition, for each point to more on the frail scale, the older adult has a greater chance of falling. On the other hand, for each medication withdrawn, the chance of falling decreases 10%.Conclusion: The fall was associated with clinical factors in older adults, therefore constant evaluations must be carried out to identify this event and its triggers. Objetivo: Analisar os fatores demográficos e clínicos relacionados à queda no idoso que vive no domicílio em um seguimento de cinco anos. Método: Estudo quantitativo e longitudinal retrospectivo realizado entre 2007/2008 e 2013 com 262 participantes brasileiros com idade superior de 65 anos. Foram utilizados os instrumentos de perfil demográfico, Mini Exame do Estado Mental, doenças autorreferidas, quedas e suas características, Escala de Fragilidade de Edmonton, Escala de Lawton y Brody y Medida de Independência Funcional. Realizaram-se análise descritivo, Qui quadrado, Teste de Wilcoxon e prova de modelos mistos. Estudo aprovado pelo comitê de ética.Resultados: A maioria era do sexo feminino, com idade entre 65 e 79 anos, escolaridade entre 1 a 4 anos e aposentados. A prevalência da queda foi de 21,8% e 37,8% em ambas as avaliações. Verificou-se que para cada doença a mais que o idoso sofre, aumenta a chance de sofrer uma nova queda. Ademais, para cada ponto a mais na escala de fragilidade, o idoso apresenta uma maior chance de cair. Por outro lado, para cada medicamento a menos que o idoso utiliza, presenta chance 10% menor de cair.Conclusão: A queda esteve associada a fatores clínicos no idoso sendo necessário que o profissional de saúde realize avaliações constantes com a finalidade de identificar esse evento e seus desencadeantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".