MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134301964 · doi:10.1002/adma.202007413

Reverse‐Engineering Strain in Nanocrystallites by Tracking Trimerons

2021· article· en· W3134301964 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachel Nickel, C.C. Chi, Ashok Ranjan, Hao Ouyang, J. W. Freeland, J. van Lierop

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science CouncilU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanorodNanomaterialsStrain (injury)Metal–insulator transitionStrain engineeringCharge orderingNanotechnologyCrystalliteCondensed matter physicsNanoparticleOxideMetalOptoelectronicsCharge (physics)Metallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although strain underpins the behavior of many transition‐oxide‐based magnetic nanomaterials, it is elusive to quantify. Since the formation of orbital molecules is sensitive to strain, a metal–insulator transition should be a window into nanocrystallite strain. Using three sizes of differently strained Fe 3 O 4 polycrystalline nanorods, the impact of strain on the Verwey transition and the associated formation and dissolution processes of quasiparticle trimerons is tracked. In 40 and 50 nm long nanorods, increasing isotropic strain results in Verwey transitions going from T V ≈ 60 K to 20 K. By contrast, 700 nm long nanorods with uniaxial strain along the (110) direction have T V ≈ 150 K—the highest value reported thus far. A metal–insulator transition, like T V in Fe 3 O 4 , can be used to determine the effective strain within nanocrystallites, thus providing new insights into nanoparticle properties and nanomagnetism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207