MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134302097 · doi:10.1101/2021.03.08.434487

Boundary convection during velocity sedimentation in the Optima analytical ultracentrifuge

2021· preprint· en· W3134302097 on OpenAlexaff
Steven A. Berkowitz, Thomas M. Laue

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein purification and stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Sudbury
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytical UltracentrifugationUltracentrifugeChemistryConvectionLocal optimumChromatographyBiopharmaceuticalSedimentationThermodynamicsMathematicsPhysicsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) provides the most widely applicable, precise and accurate means for characterizing solution hydrodynamic and thermodynamic properties. In recent times AUC has found broad application in the biopharmaceutical industry as a first-principle means for quantitatively characterizing biopharmaceuticals. Boundary sedimentation velocity AUC (SV-AUC) analysis is widely used to assess protein aggregation, fragmentation and conformational variants in the same solvents used during drug development and production. SV-AUC is especially useful for the analysis of drug substance, drug product and dosing solution, where other techniques may exhibit solvent matrix issues or concentration limitations. Recently, the only manufacturer of the analytical ultracentrifuge, released its newest (third generation) analytical ultracentrifuge, the Optima, in early 2017 to replace its aging 2 nd generation XL series ultracentrifuges. However, SV-AUC data from four Optima units used in conducting characterization work on adeno-associated virus (AAV) has shown evidence of sample convection. Further investigation reveals that this problem arises from the temperature control system design, which is prone to producing destabilizing temperature induced density gradients that can lead to density inversions. The observed convection impacts both the qualitative and quantitative data generated by the Optima. The problem is intermittent and variable in severity within a given Optima unit and between Optima units. This convection appears to be mainly associated with low rotor speeds and dilute samples in dilute solvents, such as AAV samples in formulation buffers containing relatively low concentrations of salts, sugars, etc. Under these conditions it is found that a sufficiently robust stabilizing density gradient is not always present during sedimentation, making the sample susceptible to convection by localized density inversions. Because SV-AUC is used as an analytical tool in making critical decisions in the development and quality control of biotherapeutics, it is imperative to alert users about this potential problem. In general special attention to data quality needs to be made by those researchers working with very large biopharmaceutical particles (e.g. gene therapy products that involve viral vectors or nanoparticles), where the conditions leading to convection are most likely to occur. It is important to note that the XL series analytical ultracentrifuges do not suffer from this problem, indicating that this problem is unique to the Optima. Attributes that reveal the presence of this problem and strategies for its elimination or minimization are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicProtein purification and stabilityFrench-language works237,207