NEW APPROACH TO THE COMPREHENSIVE RECONSTRUCTION OF HISTORICAL QUARTERS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article provides a retrospective analysis of existing approaches to the complex reconstruction of block buildings, which developed against the background of various scientifi c paradigms. Within the framework of the paradigm of territorial development management, a new investment and prognostic approach to the complex reconstruction of historical quarters is proposed on the example of Samara. The historic quarter is viewed as a planning module for the transformation processes of a sett lement. Reconstruction of the historical quarter is presented in the aggregate of problems of preserving and developing its buildings, providing residents with the necessary level of engineering, social and transport infrastructures. A method for calculating the rates of return for complex reconstruction is proposed, which serves to test the modes of the security zoning proposed for a historical sett lement. Particular att ention is paid to the preparation of initial data for calculating the rates of return for complex reconstruction for a number of quarters selected as reference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it