MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3134357876 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.006

A7 AN INULIN-TYPE FRUCTAN ENRICHED EXCLUSIVE ENTERAL NUTRITION FORMULA MODULATES THE GUT MICROBIOME AND PROMOTES EXPANSION OF ANTI-INFLAMMATORY T CELL SUBSETS TO SUPPRESS COLITIS

2021· article· en· W3134357876 on OpenAlexaff
Genelle R. Healey, Kevin Tsai, Daniel J. Lisko, Bruce A. Vallance, Kevan Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnteral administrationMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseUlcerative colitisT cellImmunologyInulinGut floraColitisGastroenterologyMicrobiomeButyrateParenteral nutritionInternal medicineDiseaseBiologyImmune systemBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), a nutritionally complete fiber-free enteral formula, is the gold standard therapy for newly diagnosed children with Crohn’s disease (CD) but this therapy is not routinely used in pediatric ulcerative colitis patients due to lower efficacy in this subgroup. EEN therapy leads to high remission rates, however it also leads to a dysbiotic gut microbiota profile and disease relapse occurs in 60–80% of CD patients within 12 months of EEN discontinuation. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying the actions of EEN. Notably, previous studies have demonstrated that prebiotics, such as inulin-type fructans (IN), can beneficially modulate the gut microbiome, increase butyrate production and reduce inflammation by leading to anti-inflammatory T cell (i.e. FOXP3+IL10+ CD4+) expansion. To date, the effects of an IN enriched EEN (EEN IN) have not been studied. Aims To examine the effects of EEN vs EEN IN on colitis development, the gut microbiome and CD4+ T cell subsets using an adoptive T cell transfer model of colitis. Methods Mice were split into four groups: 1) Control – normal chow + PBS (n=13; negative control), 2) Chow – normal chow + naive T cell transfer (n=13; positive control), 3) EEN – Ensure Plus® + naive T cell transfer (n=13) and 4) EEN IN – Ensure Plus® with 3% IN + naive T cell transfer (n=13). Naïve T cells (or PBS) were transferred into TCR-b deficient mice and each group was started on their subsequent diets. The naïve T cells will expand into anti- or pro-inflammatory T cells subsets to either cause or suppress colitis in a gut microbiome dependent manner. Body weight and disease activity were monitored for 5-weeks. At the end of the experiment, spleen weights and colon lengths were recorded. Spleen and mesenteric/colonic lymph nodes (MLN) were collected for T cell subset analysis using flow cytometry. Gut microbiota differences were assessed using ddPCR. Short-chain fatty acid levels were analyzed using gas chromatography. The histopathology of the distal colon was scored. Results Mice fed EEN IN showed a reduction in colonic shortening (p<0.001) and histology scores (p=0.0088) compared to EEN mice, and reduced disease activity (p=0.0046) compared to Chow mice. Moreover, EEN IN mice showed a higher expansion of FOXP3+IL10+ CD4+ T cells in the MLN (p=0.0424) and spleen (p=0.0088). EEN IN also led to higher butyrate, Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides concentrations compared to EEN (p=0.0113, p=0.0063, p=0.0224; respectively) and Chow (p=0.0252, p=0.0042, p=0.0416; respectively). Conclusions EEN IN lead to superior outcomes compared to EEN and Chow. These results provide evidence to support undertaking a clinical trial utilizing EEN IN in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients. Funding Agencies Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInfant Nutrition and Health→French-language works237,207→