MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134412720 · doi:10.1117/12.2578944

Photoacoustic remote sensing 3D H&E histology with fluorescence validation

2021· article· en· W3134412720 on OpenAlexaff
Brendon S. Restall, Nathaniel J. M. Haven, Matthew T. Martell, Pradyumna Kedarisetti, Brendyn D. Cikaluk, Lashan Peiris, Sveta Silverman, Jean Deschênes, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroscopyConfocal microscopyConfocalMaterials scienceFluorescence microscopeFluorescenceFluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopyBiomedical engineeringMicroscopeGold standard (test)OpticsMedicinePhysicsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hematoxylin and Eosin (H and E) staining is the gold standard for the majority of histopathological diagnostics but requires lengthy processing times not suitable for point-of-care diagnosis. Here we demonstrate a 266-nm excitation Ultraviolet Photoacoustic Remote Sensing (UV-PARS) and Scattering Microscopy system capable of virtual H and E 3D imaging of tissues in conjunction with with confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM) for validation in thick tissues. We demonstrate the capabilities of this dual-contrast system for en-face planar and volumetric imaging of human tissue samples exhibiting high concordance with the gold standard of H and E staining procedures as well as confocal fluorescence microscopy. To our knowledge, this is the first near real-time microscopy approach capable of volumetric imaging unstained thick tissues with virtual H and E contrast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2021Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207