MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134413632 · doi:10.1117/12.2577340

Estimating adult cerebral oxygen saturation from time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy measurements with few discrete wavelengths at a single source-detector distance

2021· article· en· W3134413632 on OpenAlexaff
David J. F. Cohen, Natalie Li, Mamadou Diop

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetectorWavelengthNear-infrared spectroscopySaturation (graph theory)SpectroscopyOpticsMaterials scienceInfraredPhysicsOptoelectronicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-resolved Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (trNIRS) methods typically use multiple wavelengths and source-detector distances in conjunction with a solution of the diffusion approximation to quantify tissue blood content and oxygenation. This approach can be both computationally intensive and costly, as multiple detectors are required. We propose a novel two-layer fitting approach for multi-wavelength trNIRS, which uses a single detector while providing accurate estimates of cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) and hemoglobin content. The method uses a multi-step fitting algorithm to establish rough estimates of the absorption and scattering coefficients in the extracerebral layer and the brain, and subsequently refine those estimates, to improve accuracy while reducing crosstalk and complexity. Validation was conducted using Monte Carlo simulations in a realistic adult head model with appropriate optical properties at 680nm, 750nm, 800nm, and 830nm. The detector was located 30 mm anteriorly from the source, which was placed 50 mm above the right temple. Scalp oxygen saturation (SO2) (50%, 60%, and 70%) and ScO2 (40%-80%, 2% increments) were varied independently. The recovered ScO2 had a difference (mean±standard deviation) of 2.31±2.93% from inputted values, and cerebral total hemoglobin was recovered with a difference of 2.94±3.47%. Such high accuracy demonstrates the robustness of this computationally efficient two-layer fitting approach for analyzing multi-wavelength trNIRS measurements acquired with a single detector. Future work will involve validating the technique in tissue mimicking phantoms and animal studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207