Quantum bath effects on nonequilibrium heat transport in model molecular junctions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantum-classical dynamics simulations enable the study of nonequilibrium heat transport in realistic models of molecules coupled to thermal baths. In these simulations, the initial conditions of the bath degrees of freedom are typically sampled from classical distributions. Herein, we investigate the effects of sampling the initial conditions of the thermal baths from quantum and classical distributions on the steady-state heat current in the nonequilibrium spin-boson model-a prototypical model of a single-molecule junction-in different parameter regimes. For a broad range of parameter regimes considered, we find that the steady-state heat currents are ∼1.3-4.5 times larger with the classical bath sampling than with the quantum bath sampling. Using both types of sampling, the steady-state heat currents exhibit turnovers as a function of the bath reorganization energy, with sharper turnovers in the classical case than in the quantum case and different temperature dependencies of the turnover maxima. As the temperature gap between the hot and cold baths increases, we observe an increasing difference in the steady-state heat currents obtained with the classical and quantum bath sampling. In general, as the bath temperatures are increased, the differences between the results of the classical and quantum bath sampling decrease but remain non-negligible at the high bath temperatures. The differences are attributed to the more pronounced temperature dependence of the classical distribution compared to the quantum one. Moreover, we find that the steady-state fluctuation theorem only holds for this model in the Markovian regime when quantum bath sampling is used. Altogether, our results highlight the importance of quantum bath sampling in quantum-classical dynamics simulations of quantum heat transport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".