Kilka uwag o nazewnictwie miejskim Lublina (na przykładzie powieści "Czerwona wiosna" Józefa Łobodowskiego)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subject of research is the functions of the proper names present in the novel “Czerwona wiosna [The Red Spring]” by Jozef Łobodowski (1909-1988), an emigre writer. These functions have been defined based on the names extracted from the urban space of interwar Lublin evidenced in the work in question. The urbanonyms in the novel are genuine proper names of the streets, squares, districts, etc. in the city on the Bystrzyca River (i.e. Lublin). They function within the enclosed space defined by the center and the outskirts, for example Podwale street [meaning: at the defensive wall] defines its place in the urban space in relations to the town limits (former defensive walls). Similarly Brama Krakowska [the Krakow Gate] opens the space of Stare Miasto [Old Town quarter] outside towards Krakowskie Przedmieście [Krakow outskirt] street. In addition to their function of location, identification and distinction the proper names in the city space of the then Lublin perform a sociological function. The name Podzamcze characterizes the population living in this quarter as Jewish; similarly, the name Bronowice characterizes the quarter as a working class district. The expressive function of the urbanonyms in the novel defines the attitude of the main character and the writer towards specific fragments of Lublin’s urban space – the city of the novel’s hero Jozef Zakrzewski’s youth and the arcadia of Jozef Łobodowski’s youth (the author of “The Red Spring”).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it