Smart Mandibular Advancement Device for Intraoral Monitoring of Cardiorespiratory Parameters and Sleeping Postures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), as a highly prevalent sleep disorder, causes several serious health complaints. It has been proved that using intraoral mandibular advancement devices (MADs) during sleep is an efficient treatment for OSA. However, due to limited number of sleep study laboratories, effectiveness of MAD therapy is not regularly monitored. This paper proposes a smart MAD with the capability of continuously monitoring of cardiorespiratory parameters as well as sleeping postures and breathing routes. In this regard, a flexible hybrid wireless sensing platform based on the intraoral photoplethysmography (PPG), temperature and accelerometry monitoring is developed. It is qualitatively and quantitatively discussed that the intraorally captured PPG signals by the smart MAD have similar features as the ones received from the conventional anatomical position, i.e., the left index fingertip. Extensive experimental measurements indicate that the proposed smart MAD can estimate heart-rate (HR), respiration rate (RR) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) with the maximum mean-absolute-errors of 2.4 bpm, 2.52 breaths/min, and 0.8%, respectively, in comparison to the reference measurements, while such a capability is not dependent on subject's positions and breathing routes. It is also shown that the smart MAD can readily identify different sleeping postures, namely, supine, left, right, and prone and breathing routes. The reliability and stability of the proposed smart MAD's measurements are proved by examining a group of subjects. The proposed smart MAD has potential to monitor the effectiveness of MAD treatment and eliminate untreated OSA without the requirement of attaching an extra monitoring platform to the patient's body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".