MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134574031 · doi:10.3390/fluids6030103

Spatial Form of a Hamiltonian Dysthe Equation for Deep-Water Gravity Waves

2021· article· en· W3134574031 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Guyenne, Adilbek Kairzhan, Catherine Sulem, Boyang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueFluids · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnsatzInviscid flowHamiltonian (control theory)Nonlinear Schrödinger equationWave packetPhysicsDeep waterClassical mechanicsNonlinear systemBurgers' equationGravitational waveMathematical physicsMathematicsGeologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An overview of a Hamiltonian framework for the description of nonlinear modulation of surface water waves is presented. The main result is the derivation of a Hamiltonian version of Dysthe’s equation for two-dimensional gravity waves on deep water. The reduced problem is obtained via a Birkhoff normal form transformation which not only helps eliminate all non-resonant cubic terms but also yields a non-perturbative procedure for surface reconstruction. The free surface is reconstructed from the wave envelope by solving an inviscid Burgers’ equation with an initial condition given by the modulational Ansatz. Particular attention is paid to the spatial form of this model, which is simulated numerically and tested against laboratory experiments on periodic groups and short-wave packets. Satisfactory agreement is found in all these cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFluidsSame topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207