MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134616907 · doi:10.18023/ijece.2020.26.2.002

어머니의 결혼만족도와 유아의 또래상호작용 관계에서 가족상호작용의 매개효과

2020· article· ko· W3134616907 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Myunghwa Moon

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2020
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

본 연구는 어머니의 결혼만족도와 유아의 또래 상호작용 관계에서 가족 상호작용의 매개효과를 확인하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 육아정책연구소에서 실시한 한국아동패널의 2014년 자료에서 만6세 자녀를 둔 어머니 1158명의 응답을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과 첫째, 어머니의 결혼만족도는 가족상호작용에 직접적으로 유의한 영향을 미치고 가족상호작용은 유아의 또래상호작용에 직접적인 유의한 영향을 미친다. 어머니의 결혼만족도는 또래상호작용에 직접적인 영향이 없었다. 둘째, 어머니의 결혼만족도는 가족상호작용을 통해 유아의 또래상호작용에 간접적으로 유의한 영향을 주며 그 매개효과의 유의성을 검증하였다. 즉, 어머니의 결혼만족도가 높을수록 가족상호작용이 높아져 교육기관에서 유아의 또래상호작용에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 연구결과는 가족상호작용의 중요성을 확인하고 어머니가 지각하는 결혼만족도가 가족 간의 상호작용과 같은 환경·정서적 양육요인을 통해 유아의 또래 상호작용에 영향을 미침을 확인한 것에 그 의의가 있다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.017
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood educationSame topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207