MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134632163 · doi:10.3917/rn.185.0049

Libéralisme élitiste et démocratie hégémonique

2018· article· fr· W3134632163 on OpenAlexaff
Xavier Dupret, François Reman

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Revue Nouvelle · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les maux dont souffrent les démocraties latino-américaines trouvent leur origine dès l’indépendance des nouvelles républiques. À cette époque, les nouveaux dirigeants affirment les principes de liberté et d’égalité dans des sociétés intégrant en partie des traits constitutifs du mode de production esclavagiste. Par conséquent, les différences sociales reposent sur des discriminations ethnoraciales. Les élites locales se montreront par la suite peu enclines à partager un pouvoir dont elles s’estiment naturellement dépositaires. Au fil du temps, des couches plus modestes de la population ne vont pas se priver de contester cette volonté de maintenir un statuquo structurellement inégalitaire. Des forces politiques contestataires répondront à une partie de ces attentes, quitte à mettre en œuvre un nouvel ordre démocratique en rupture avec le libéralisme classique des origines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.017
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Revue NouvelleSame topicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactFrench-language works237,207