Vehicle Assisted Computing Offloading for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Smart City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart city emerges a promising paradigm for improving operational efficiency of city and comfort of people. With embedded multi-sensors, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) hold great potential for collecting sensing data and providing social services in smart city. However, due to the limited battery lifetime and processing capacities of UAVs, the efficient offloading scheme of UAVs is urgently needed in smart city. Therefore, in this article, a vehicle-assisted computing offloading architecture for UAVs is proposed to improve offloading efficiency by harnessing the moving vehicles in smart city. We first develop an offloading model for UAVs to determine the offloading strategy. Next, to select the optimal vehicles for offloading, we formulate a matching scheme based on the preference lists of UAVs and vehicles to derive the optimal matching between UAVs and vehicles. After that, to improve the offloading efficiency and maximize the utilities of UAVs and vehicles, the transaction process of computing data between UAVs and vehicles is modeled as a bargaining game. Moreover, an offloading algorithm for UAVs and vehicles is proposed to obtain the optimal strategy. Finally, simulations are performed to validate the efficiency of the proposed offloading scheme. The results demonstrate that the proposed offloading scheme can significantly save resource and improve the utilities of UAVs and vehicles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".