MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134666511 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2020.0300

France in Flux: Space, Territory, and Contemporary Culture éds. par Blatt Ari J. et Welch Edward

2020· article· fr· W3134666511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine Gaughan

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyMedia studiesPoliticsAnthropologyGeographyArt historyHistoryPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: France in Flux: Space, Territory, and Contemporary Culture éds. par Blatt Ari J. et Welch Edward Catherine Gaughan Blatt, Ari J., and Edward Welch, eds. France in Flux: Space, Territory, and Contemporary Culture. Liverpool UP, 2019. ISBN 978-1-78694-178-7. Pp. 221. This is an exciting look into the "shape" of metropolitan France's national identity. The eight wide-ranging articles bring new and original ideas to the table as they contend with such diverse topics as topography, politics, and ecology through French literary and visual culture since the 1980s. Taking a deeper look into a variety of marginal, peripheral, and hybrid spaces and exploring landscapes and people, the book invites a renewed critical engagement with metropolitan France. From the mounting tensions of the Parisian suburbs, or the banlieues, to questions of decentralization and modernization, a variety of issues emerge including debates on postcolonial, postindustrial, and transnational identity. The first article looks back at spatial planning and the paysages photographiques of DATAR while another showcases Raymond Depardon's 2008 documentary La vie moderne exploring connections to history and geography that move well beyond the screen. Equally pertinent questions involving economic and cultural exchange between urban and rural zones are taken into account. There is also a compelling discussion of power dynamics and the formatting of female bodies within their environments in Fiona Handyside's study of two contemporary films, 17 Filles and Bande de filles. Although each work stands alone in its exploration of France's social and cultural landscape, the collection as a whole places France at a critical artistic and historical crossroads that will determine the ways in which the country may choose to construct its identity inside and beyond its borders. Overall, the notion of the global and the local as it applies to the changing face of France from its abandoned buildings and industrial sites to refugee camps contrasts starkly with typical touristic representations and remains at the core of the collection. The many photographs and illustrations throughout the book convey these topographical changes, particularly in "Picturing a Nation of Local Places," and contribute to a sense of the territory in both real and concrete forms. The well-researched and original essays span the gamut of changing identity and reflect upon current issues of modernization, globalization, and migration of the Francophone world. The book provides a wealth of research to pursue further study in the field and, more significantly, suggests ways to navigate the ever-changing shape of the French nation as well as new topographical and ecological directions France may take as the century unfolds. The editors have compiled a volume certainly worth having in any contemporary French and Francophone cultural studies collection, as the articles will serve as reference points to assertions of national identity now and in the future. [End Page 243] Catherine Gaughan University of Toronto (ON) Copyright © 2020 American Association of Teachers of French

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207